Dis-oriented ?
Here are some questions that we could relate to the tracing issues we talked about yesterday…
How do we communicate? 1/part
This question involves communication with other humans, but also with our surrounding environment. Which means also to consider how we orient ourselves in our environment. We talked yesterday about how autistic children seem to feel natural phenomenon such as magnetism and water, which could mean that they somehow communicate with their environment through the perception of signs or feeling that we don’t necessarily perceive. Yet, and this is very much obvious while we visit foreign countries, and especially, for western people, countries like china or Japan, where you can’t understand most of the urban signs and sometimes the urban structures, which capacities are involved, which signs are being read, recognized, interpreted, how is urban environment read? And how are people getting the resources to orient themselves? How do they communicate with surrounding environment, with signs, with humans, with maps? And also, how do the learn to cope with the feelings that disorientation creates?
I certainly feel that the capacity of observing, guessing, reading the urban environment has been strongly developed during my trips in china. It’s a very simple example, but when I was in Istanbul and Italy with my friends, I could feel the difference between us by the way I could easily find what I was looking for, by constantly reading the signs, etc. This capacity of keeping my eyes open comes essentially from chinese experiences.
Are we allowed to get lost? 迷路了吗 ?
Yet, the question is what is going to happen with GPS becoming popular? Are we paradoxically going to lose completely our capacity to orient ourselves? Because we’ll become lazy, will we lose this capacity to read our environment? And will we lose also these unexpected encounters, the serendipity that is somehow allowed by disorientation and that constitutes the core of urban life? Disorientation isn’t a way to keep out of routine, a way of looking at things in a pretty different way? Getting a fresh look on things and allow us to be surprised. Maybe the possibility // the ability to get lost is the difference between traces and maps.
August 19th, 2008 - 22:53
very nicely put, b… i am thinking in it the same way that we talked about how GPS systems presuppose that the mapped network, a framework of all possibilities shown in some sort of visual format, is similar to this inability to get lost that you mention… chance, serendipity and being lost are things that don’t exist on a map, they are flowing vectors that perhaps only exist in co-presence with other factors, such as time, encounter or willingness to perceive the unknown… this is how traces become remnants, or walking becomes architecture… what do you think?
also curious when sean gets a chance, follow up on how you perceived our three variations on this reading to be…!
August 23rd, 2008 - 16:16
so, I was recently watching the making of Persepolis – which is actually an excellent animated film, definitely recommend it! – and I discovered that “tracing” is a very specialized job, wich consists of “going over the drawing with a felt tip” – check it out on youtube!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD6qxyH5rA4
and the trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PXHeKuBzPY